memes.cjtrowbridge.com

Category: Polyamory

The meme is a visual comparison between two images. The top image shows a person with a relaxed and happy expression, while the bottom image shows the same person with a shocked and upset expression. The text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" appears above the images, and the text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is repeated in the bottom image, with the text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is replaced with "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is replaced with "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it".

Polyamory

2023-07-21T00:09:27+00:00

The meme is a visual comparison between two images. The top image shows a person with a relaxed and happy expression, while the bottom image shows the same person with a shocked and upset expression. The text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" appears above the images, and the text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is repeated in the bottom image, with the text "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is replaced with "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it" is replaced with "In 2-3 sentences, describe this meme for someone who cannot see it".

This meme is a humorous commentary on the idea of monogamy. It features a stone carving of a ancient Indian temple depicting a scene of multiple people engaging in intimate activities. The text above the image reads "In ancient civilizations..." and the text below reads "Monogamy was never a thing".

Polyamory

2023-05-10T21:03:39+00:00

This meme is a humorous commentary on the idea of monogamy. It features a stone carving of a ancient Indian temple depicting a scene of multiple people engaging in intimate activities. The text above the image reads "In ancient civilizations..." and the text below reads "Monogamy was never a thing".