memes.cjtrowbridge.com

Anti-Anti-Post-Structuralism

First Seen:

2023-05-10T21:03:32+00:00

Gemma-3-27b's Take:

Okay, let's break down this meme using the requested analytical lenses. It's a loaded image, and the analyses will reflect that. **Visual Description** The image is a triptych, taking three separate screenshots from Disney’s *The Jungle Book*. Each scene features Mowgli, a small child, alongside a carved stone statue (representing “Solid philosophical competencies”), and a dark panther (representing Jordan Peterson). The third frame adds a lion (Slavoj Žižek) and a crab (representing “muh lobsters”). Text is overlaid on the image, labeling each character/object. The overall composition is deliberately suggestive, implying a power dynamic and a certain narrative relationship between these elements. The scene is set within a cave or grotto, visually reinforcing a sense of primitivism, enclosure, and, potentially, the "cave" of the unconscious or the pre-rational mind. --- **Foucauldian Genealogical Discourse Analysis** This image works *very* well through a Foucauldian lens. The arrangement posits "Solid philosophical competencies" as a foundational structure, potentially representing the establishment of a discourse – a way of talking, thinking, and knowing. The recurring figure of Jordan Peterson appears to be a *regime of truth* asserting itself over this structure. * **Power/Knowledge:** Peterson’s constant presence highlights the connection between power and knowledge. He isn’t simply offering insight; he's *imposing* a specific worldview (often rooted in a hierarchical, traditionalist understanding of masculinity and order) on the "foundations" of philosophical competence. The fact that he appears in all panels suggests a pervasive and controlling influence. * **Genealogy:** The image can be seen as a genealogical tracing of an idea. It's a critique of how certain philosophical traditions (the statue) have been co-opted and reformulated by a specific, often conservative, ideology (Peterson). * **Discursive Formation:** The third frame introduces Žižek and the "lobsters"– a direct reference to Peterson's famous (and often criticized) analogy about the dominance hierarchies of crustaceans as a metaphor for human social structures. The inclusion of this symbol within the scene creates a framing of the discourse – that this specific conversation and line of thought is pervasive, absurd, and indicative of broader social anxieties. --- **Critical Theory** From a Critical Theory perspective, this meme is a clear critique of intellectual authority and the co-option of complex ideas for ideological purposes. * **Ideology:** The image portrays a certain ideological structure. “Solid philosophical competencies” are presented as static, possibly naive, while Peterson appears as the active force shaping and manipulating that foundation. This suggests a critique of how intellectual traditions can be used to reinforce existing power structures. * **Hegemony:** Peterson’s recurring presence suggests a hegemonic force – an influence that appears natural and inevitable, but is, in fact, constructed and maintained through discourse. His constant positioning beside the philosophical foundations implies that his interpretation *is* the way to understand those foundations. * **Commodification of Intellectualism:** This meme hints at a larger problem of the commodification of intellectualism, where complex ideas are simplified and repackaged to gain cultural or political traction. --- **Marxist Conflict Theory** Looking at this image through the lens of Marxist conflict theory, we can see a symbolic representation of class struggle – not necessarily economic, but *intellectual*. * **Base and Superstructure:** The statue could represent the "base" – the foundation of knowledge and reason – while Peterson and the other characters form the "superstructure" – the ideological beliefs and practices that emerge from that base. The image implies that the superstructure is distorting or controlling the base. * **Power Dynamics:** The positioning of the characters and the labeling immediately establishes a power dynamic. Peterson is positioned as the dominant force, while the statue (representing philosophical competence) is a passive object. * **False Consciousness:** The meme could suggest that those who accept Peterson’s interpretations of philosophy are operating under "false consciousness"– they have been led to believe a distorted version of reality that serves the interests of a dominant ideology. --- **Postmodernism** The image can be interpreted through a postmodern lens, highlighting themes of relativism, deconstruction, and the instability of meaning. * **Deconstruction:** The meme actively *deconstructs* the idea of intellectual authority. By placing Peterson alongside the statue and adding the absurd elements of Žižek and the lobster, the image challenges the notion that any single figure (or ideology) has a monopoly on truth. * **Simulacra and Simulation:** This could be seen as a "simulacrum" – a copy without an original. The meme is a playful and cynical commentary on how intellectual discourse has become increasingly detached from reality. * **Irony and Parody:** The meme relies heavily on irony and parody. It's a mocking critique of both Peterson and the intellectual circles that have embraced his ideas. --- **Queer Feminist Intersectional Analysis** While not immediately obvious, a queer feminist intersectional analysis reveals some subtle critiques. * **Masculinity and Power:** Peterson is a prominent figure in online discussions about masculinity. The image places him as a domineering figure, reinforcing a traditional, hierarchical understanding of power. This can be seen as a critique of toxic masculinity and its influence on intellectual discourse. * **Marginalization of Alternative Voices:** The image’s emphasis on Peterson and Žižek, both white male philosophers, suggests a marginalization of voices from other perspectives – particularly those of women, people of color, and queer individuals. * **Deconstruction of Foundational Narratives:** The placement of the statue (representing "solid philosophical competencies") alongside the figures implies a critique of traditional, patriarchal philosophical narratives and the ways they have historically excluded or silenced marginalized voices. The crab ("muh lobsters") serves as a sarcastic symbol for essentializing social hierarchy. In conclusion, this meme is a surprisingly layered and complex image that offers a variety of interpretations through different critical lenses. It’s a sardonic commentary on intellectual authority, power dynamics, and the commodification of ideas – a playful but pointed critique of contemporary discourse.

Llama-3.2-11b's Take:

This meme is a humorous take on the concept of intellectual superiority. It features a character from a children's story, The Lion King, who is known for his wise and philosophical words. The image shows the character, who is often depicted as a wise and knowledgeable lion, sitting in a throne-like chair, with a quote "I am the one who knows" written above him.