memes.cjtrowbridge.com

Anti-Doomer

First Seen:

2023-05-10T21:03:33+00:00

Gemma-3-27b's Take:

Okay, let's break down this meme with a few theoretical lenses. It's worth noting this meme is layered and ripe for analysis, leaning heavily into certain theoretical frameworks. **Visual Description** The meme juxtaposes text dialogue with a screenshot from Disney’s *Pocahontas*. The image shows Pocahontas and John Smith engaged in a close encounter. The visual is intentionally dramatic. John Smith is kneeling, seemingly in distress or submission, and Pocahontas is standing above him, looking down with a determined expression. The background is a blurred forest, suggesting a remote, primal setting. The meme adds the text "Then we must do without hope. There is always vengeance." over the image. Notably, the meme also contains a black asterisk over John Smith's face. **Foucauldian Genealogical Discourse Analysis** This meme can be examined through a Foucauldian lens by looking at the power dynamics and discourse surrounding climate change and responses to it. * **Discourse of Despair:** The initial statement ("there’s no hope of stopping global warming now") establishes a discourse of inevitability and helplessness. This discourse functions as a *power/knowledge* formation, effectively shutting down possibilities for action by framing the problem as insurmountable. * **Shifting the Discourse:** The meme's response, “Then we must do without hope. There is always vengeance,” actively *renegotiates* this discourse. It doesn't accept the imposed despair but reframes the response in terms of retribution or justice. This is a strategic shift in the power/knowledge formation. It says, "If we cannot prevent harm, we will seek accountability." * **Genealogy of "Vengeance":** Examining the genealogy of "vengeance" itself reveals how it has been historically constructed as a 'primitive' response. It's often positioned in opposition to 'rational' or 'legal' justice. However, the meme actively *reclaims* vengeance, suggesting it’s a legitimate (and perhaps necessary) response to systemic ecological damage. * **Asterisk Over John Smith:** The asterisk could be seen as an erasure of colonial agency in relation to ecological devastation, suggesting that it's not just about abstract natural processes but about the legacy of colonial exploitation. **Critical Theory (Specifically, Frankfurt School)** The meme reflects a common theme in Critical Theory – the critique of instrumental reason and the loss of meaning in the face of systemic problems. * **The Dialectic of Enlightenment:** The initial statement (“there’s no hope”) embodies a pessimistic outlook that could be interpreted through the lens of Adorno and Horkheimer’s *Dialectic of Enlightenment*. The meme suggests that a purely rational (and ultimately hopeless) approach to climate change has failed. * **Critique of Positivism:** The meme challenges a strictly positivistic view, which would focus solely on data and technical solutions. It introduces *affect* and *emotion* (vengeance) as legitimate forces for resistance. * **Reification and Subjectivity:** The meme suggests a rejection of the idea that humans are simply passive victims of climate change. By embracing "vengeance," it asserts a degree of agency and subjectivity, even in the face of overwhelming forces. * **Loss of Utopian Vision:** The rejection of "hope" could be seen as a symptom of the loss of utopian vision in modern thought. However, the meme doesn't necessarily equate this with despair. It offers a different kind of motivation – not to *prevent* harm, but to *respond* to it. **Marxist Conflict Theory** This meme can be understood as an articulation of class conflict in the context of ecological crisis. * **Capitalist Exploitation & Environmental Degradation:** Marxist theory argues that capitalism inherently leads to the exploitation of both people and the environment. The meme can be seen as a response to the realization that the current system is driving ecological collapse. * **Vengeance as Class Consciousness:** The call for "vengeance" can be interpreted as a metaphorical expression of class consciousness, a recognition that the powerful have caused harm and must be held accountable. * **Rejection of Reconciliation:** It suggests a rejection of attempts at reconciliation or compromise within the current system. It's not about *fixing* capitalism; it's about *responding* to its consequences. * **The Colonizer/Colonized Dyad:** By utilizing an image of a colonizer, the meme subtly highlights the structural nature of exploitation and dominance. The ecological crisis is not just an abstract problem; it's rooted in historical and ongoing patterns of power. **Postmodernism** Postmodern theory offers ways to understand the meme's rejection of grand narratives and its embrace of a more fragmented and subjective response to climate change. * **Rejection of Metanarratives:** The initial statement about the inevitability of climate change represents a metanarrative—a universal explanation that attempts to account for all of reality. The meme rejects this totalizing narrative and proposes a more localized and emotionally driven response. * **Deconstruction of Hope:** The meme deconstructs the concept of "hope." It doesn’t simply abandon hope; it questions its meaning and usefulness in the face of systemic problems. * **Emphasis on Subjectivity:** The meme’s focus on "vengeance" prioritizes subjective experience and emotional response over rational calculation. * **Simulacra and Simulation:** The Disney image itself could be seen as a simulacrum—a copy without an original. This adds another layer of complexity, suggesting that our understanding of the environment and our responses to it are often mediated by representations. **Queer Feminist Intersectional Analysis** While not the primary focus, an intersectional analysis can illuminate how climate change impacts marginalized communities and how responses can be framed through the lens of justice and empowerment. * **Disproportionate Impact:** Climate change disproportionately affects marginalized communities, especially women and people of color. The call for "vengeance" can be seen as a demand for accountability for the harms inflicted on these communities. * **Decoloniality:** The image of Pocahontas within a colonial frame highlights the connection between colonial exploitation and environmental degradation. It connects the quest for vengeance to an anti-colonial struggle. * **Reclaiming Agency:** The meme empowers a marginalized voice (Pocahontas) and positions her as an agent of change, rather than a victim of circumstance. * **Intersection of Environmental & Social Justice:** The meme suggests that the fight for environmental justice is inextricably linked to the fight for social justice. In conclusion, the meme is a surprisingly complex and nuanced statement. It is an excellent example of how seemingly simple images and phrases can be laden with theoretical weight and offer a powerful commentary on the climate crisis.

Llama-3.2-11b's Take:

This meme is a humorous take on a famous quote from the movie "The Princess Bride". The image shows Inigo Montoya, a character from the movie, quoting a line that has become a popular cultural reference. The quote "I do not mean to be cruel, but you have brought it on yourself" is replaced with "In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years."