Meme Categories:

Category: Anti-Consensus

This meme is a humorous take on the concept of a "red flag" in online discussions. It shows a person being asked to explain a joke, with the response "it's a joke" being met with a skeptical "it's not funny". The meme is captioned "it's a joke" and "it's not funny" in a humorous exchange between two characters.

Anti-Consensus

First Seen:

2023-11-30T00:14:05+00:00

Gemma-3-27b's Take:

Okay, let's break down this meme using the requested theoretical frameworks. It's a layered image ripe for analysis, playing with notions of inclusion, power dynamics, and performative acceptance. ## Visual Description The image is a two-panel meme format using stills from the TV show “Rick and Morty”. * **Panel 1:** Shows Rick Sanchez (a cynical, scientifically brilliant character) looking down on a group of blue aliens, labeled as “Newcomers”. The text “consensus” appears above Rick, suggesting he's arriving at a decision regarding these beings. The setting is an elaborately decorated room suggesting a space of authority. * **Panel 2:** Shows Rick facing the same group of aliens, but now he's shouting “EVERYONE IS WELCOME HERE!”. The same richly decorated room is visible. His expression is strained and suggests insincerity. The overall composition juxtaposes a posture of looking down upon (literally and figuratively) with a vocal proclamation of inclusivity. This contrast is the heart of the meme’s humor and analytical potential. ## Foucauldian Genealogical Discourse Analysis This meme powerfully illustrates Foucault’s concepts of **power/knowledge** and **discourse**. * **Power/Knowledge:** Rick, representing a position of power (intellectual, scientific, and implied social), *defines* what constitutes “welcome”. He doesn't ask the aliens what they need; he *imposes* a definition of inclusion. This reveals how knowledge isn't neutral, but is linked to power structures. The room itself signifies institutional power – it’s a space where definitions are made and enforced. * **Discourse:** The statement “EVERYONE IS WELCOME HERE!” is a *discourse* – a system of thought, language, and practice. However, the meme highlights how discourse can be *performative* rather than genuine. The way Rick delivers the line, coupled with the visual of looking down on the aliens, suggests the statement is a *regulatory* one, meant to maintain a specific power dynamic rather than promote true inclusion. It is a discourse that is meant to *normalize* a particular power structure by *appearing* inclusive, while not addressing any real inequalities. * **Genealogy:** We could trace the *genealogy* of this “welcome” discourse. Historically, statements of inclusion have often been used to justify exclusion (e.g., "all men are created equal" coexisting with slavery). This meme taps into that historical tension, implying the same performative inclusion is happening here. ## Critical Theory The meme critiques the concept of **false consciousness**. Rick appears to be embracing an ideology of inclusion, but his body language and the context suggest this is a shallow performance. * **Ideology:** The statement “EVERYONE IS WELCOME HERE!” can be viewed as an ideological claim. However, the meme implies this claim does not align with actual practice or lived experience (of the aliens). * **Domination:** The power dynamic is central. Rick is *positioned* as dominant, and his statement serves to reinforce that dominance. It’s a way to manage the “newcomers” without actually relinquishing control. * **Emancipation:** The lack of genuine inclusion points to the difficulty of achieving true emancipation. The aliens remain "othered" despite the claim of welcome. ## Marxist Conflict Theory This meme, viewed through a Marxist lens, portrays a power struggle disguised as inclusivity. * **Class/Power Dynamics:** Rick embodies a position of power (intellectual, social, and possibly economic). The aliens represent a marginalized group seeking acceptance. * **False Consciousness:** As above, Rick's statement is a form of ideological control, masking the underlying power imbalance. He *appears* to be leveling the playing field, but is actually maintaining the status quo. * **Exploitation:** While not explicit, we could infer that the “welcome” is conditional – the aliens might be expected to conform to Rick’s norms or contribute to his goals. * **Hegemony:** Rick is attempting to establish *hegemony* – a dominant ideology that is accepted as "common sense." His statement aims to normalize the existing power structure, making it seem natural and inevitable. ## Postmodernism The meme exemplifies several postmodern concepts: * **Deconstruction:** The image *deconstructs* the meaning of “welcome.” It shows how seemingly straightforward concepts can be complex, contradictory, and used to serve hidden agendas. * **Simulation & Hyperreality:** Rick's proclamation *simulates* inclusivity, but it is a superficial performance devoid of genuine connection. This creates a *hyperreality* where the *appearance* of inclusion is valued more than actual inclusivity. * **Meta-Narratives:** The meme implicitly critiques grand narratives of universal welcome. It suggests that such narratives are often used to justify power imbalances. * **Irony & Parody:** The meme is fundamentally ironic. It uses humor to expose the hypocrisy of performative inclusion. ## Queer Feminist Intersectional Analysis This framework adds layers of nuance. * **Othering:** The aliens represent a “Othered” group, and Rick’s initial posture reinforces this. The “welcome” may be conditional on the aliens conforming to dominant norms, erasing their unique identities. * **Intersectionality:** The aliens’ marginalization can be understood through an intersectional lens. Their “alienness” intersects with other potential forms of marginalization, creating a complex web of power dynamics. * **Performativity (Judith Butler):** Rick’s "welcome" is a performance of inclusivity. He *enacts* the role of the welcoming host, but this performance doesn’t necessarily challenge the underlying power structures. * **Dominant Discourse & Silencing:** The meme highlights how dominant discourses (like pronouncements of welcome) can silence marginalized voices. The aliens are not given a voice to express their own needs or perspectives. In conclusion, this meme, while simple in appearance, is a rich site for theoretical analysis. It exposes the hypocrisy of performative inclusion and challenges us to examine the power dynamics that often lurk beneath seemingly welcoming gestures.

Llama-3.2-11b's Take:

This meme is a humorous take on the concept of a "red flag" in online discussions. It shows a person being asked to explain a joke, with the response "it's a joke" being met with a skeptical "it's not funny". The meme is captioned "it's a joke" and "it's not funny" in a humorous exchange between two characters.

The meme is a humorous representation of a common online interaction. It depicts a person trying to explain a complex concept to a group of newcomers, but they're not interested. The person says "I'm trying to explain the concept of a 'consensus' to you all, but it's like herding cats" and then someone in the group responds with "it's just a 'common sense' thing".

Anti-Consensus

First Seen:

2023-11-29T21:11:13+00:00

Gemma-3-27b's Take:

Okay, here's an analysis of the image-macro, broken down into the requested sections. It's important to note that this is interpretation, and the meme's strength lies in its open-endedness. I will make assumptions based on common interpretations of such imagery and text, but these interpretations are not absolute. **Visual Description** The image is a two-panel meme using stills from the television show *Community*. * **Panel 1:** Shows a man, identified as Jeff Winger, standing in a room with a large purple, amorphous blob (often interpreted as representing a "group" or "collective"). The text overlay reads "Inner Circle" and above the blob, "Consensus." The environment suggests a community space, likely a study group room. The framing suggests distance and a power dynamic. * **Panel 2:** Jeff is shown in the same room but now adopting a forced, possibly insincere expression, attempting to interact with the blob. The overlay reads "Everyone is Welcome Here!" The use of *Community*, a show about a study group with complex dynamics, adds layers to the interpretation. The purple blob is a recurring motif in the show, often representing a "meta" commentary on group dynamics or a personification of their shared energy. The contrast between the first and second panel creates a sense of performative inclusivity. --- **Foucauldian Genealogical Discourse Analysis** This meme speaks to the *production of normalcy* and the *power dynamics inherent in the assertion of inclusivity*. Foucault's work emphasizes that power isn’t just repressive; it’s *productive*. In this context: * **Discourse:** The "Everyone is Welcome Here!" statement is not a genuine expression of openness but a *discourse* – a system of thought and language that constructs and reinforces certain power relationships. It’s a way of *speaking* inclusivity into being, but the initial panel shows a clear separation and lack of genuine integration. * **Genealogy:** Tracing the "history" of the statement reveals how it has become a *performative* act, a ritualistic utterance often divorced from real change. It's a demand for compliance and social acceptance of a certain viewpoint. The initial panel hints at a history where the 'inner circle' was more exclusive. * **Power/Knowledge:** The 'inner circle' establishes knowledge - what is acceptable and the boundaries of that 'welcome'. They decide what 'welcome' looks like. The performative inclusivity becomes a way to *control* the narrative and maintain the existing power structure. --- **Critical Theory** The meme embodies a critique of *false consciousness* and *performative activism*. * **False Consciousness:** The "Everyone is Welcome Here!" statement, especially when juxtaposed with the first panel's visual separation, suggests a disjunction between stated ideals and actual practices. It highlights the idea that groups may proclaim inclusivity while subconsciously or consciously maintaining exclusionary dynamics. * **Performative Activism:** The act of *saying* something is inclusive does not automatically *make* it inclusive. The meme suggests a superficial level of engagement, where the outward performance of acceptance overshadows genuine effort toward systemic change. * **Ideology:** The meme challenges the ideology of universal inclusion, suggesting that it can be used to mask existing power imbalances. It's a critique of the idea that simply *stating* a value is enough to achieve it. --- **Marxist Conflict Theory** From a Marxist perspective, the meme highlights the conflict between stated ideals and material reality. * **Power Dynamics:** The 'inner circle' represents a dominant group with control over resources (social capital, influence, etc.). The blob represents those outside of that group, aspiring to be included. * **False Consciousness:** The 'inner circle' uses the rhetoric of inclusivity ('Everyone is Welcome Here!') to legitimize its position and suppress potential conflict. It maintains the status quo by presenting an image of harmony and openness that doesn't reflect the actual power dynamics. * **Ideology as Control:** The phrase can be used to prevent action in a way that is favorable to those in power. The blob, thinking it has been welcomed, is less likely to question the existing structure. --- **Postmodernism** The meme embodies several postmodern ideas: * **Deconstruction:** The meme *deconstructs* the notion of inclusivity by revealing its potential for insincerity and performativity. It shows how a seemingly positive concept can be used to reinforce existing power structures. * **Simulation and Hyperreality:** The "Everyone is Welcome Here!" statement becomes a *simulation* of inclusivity, a surface-level representation that lacks genuine substance. It’s a *hyperreality* – a more real-than-real representation of inclusivity that obscures the underlying power dynamics. * **Rejection of Grand Narratives:** The meme implicitly challenges the idea that inclusivity is a universally achievable goal. It suggests that inclusivity is a complex and contested concept, not a simple ideal. --- **Queer Feminist Intersectional Analysis** This meme can be interpreted through a Queer Feminist Intersectional lens to expose the layers of exclusion within seemingly inclusive spaces: * **Interlocking Systems of Oppression:** The 'inner circle' represents a dominant group (potentially cisgender, heterosexual, white, etc.) who define what 'welcome' looks like, often centering their own experiences and marginalizing those with different identities. The blob represents those from marginalized groups. * **Performative Allyship:** The "Everyone is Welcome Here!" statement can be seen as performative allyship – an act of signaling support for marginalized groups without actually addressing systemic issues. It’s a way to appear progressive without making meaningful change. * **Symbolic Violence:** The separation between the 'inner circle' and the blob in the first panel represents symbolic violence – the ways in which dominant groups use language and behavior to maintain their power and control. * **Centering Marginalized Voices:** The meme invites us to question *who* defines inclusivity and *whose* experiences are centered. Is the "welcome" truly extended to everyone, or is it conditional and limited? **In Conclusion:** The image is a multi-layered meme that works due to its ambiguity and resonance with contemporary social and political debates. It's a satirical critique of performative activism, false consciousness, and the challenges of achieving genuine inclusivity within existing power structures. Each theoretical framework offers a different lens through which to understand the meme's message.

Llama-3.2-11b's Take:

The meme is a humorous representation of a common online interaction. It depicts a person trying to explain a complex concept to a group of newcomers, but they're not interested. The person says "I'm trying to explain the concept of a 'consensus' to you all, but it's like herding cats" and then someone in the group responds with "it's just a 'common sense' thing".